Preliminaries

Graph Theory

Definition. A coloring is proper if no adjacent vertices are assigned the same color.

Definition. The chromatic number χ(G)\chi(G) is the smallest number of colours to colour a graph.

Complex Analysis

Definition. A curve γ\gamma in open UCU \subseteq \mathbb{C} is

γ:[a,b]U\gamma: [a,b] \rightarrow U

Notation. The curve γ\gamma could be expressed as a parameteric function f(e2πit)f(e^{2 \pi i t}) for 0t10 \leq t \leq 1.

Definition. The continuity of a complex-valued function is defined in an analogous manner to real-valued functions.

Definition. For continuous F:[a,b]CF:[a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{C}, the integral of [a,b][a,b] is

abF(t)  dt=abu(t)  dt+iabv(t)  dt\int_a^b F(t) \; dt = \int_a^b u(t) \; dt + i \int_a^b v(t) \; dt

Definition. The winding number with respect to point α\alpha over closed path γ\gamma is

W(γ,α)=12πiγ1zα  dzW(\gamma,\alpha) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_\gamma \frac{1}{z - \alpha} \; dz

Definition. The degree of a function deg(f)deg(f) is the wind number W(f(e2πit))W(f(e^{2 \pi it})).

Other

Fact. Vectors of d-dim sphere are exactly the vectors of the (d+1)-dim Euclidean space whose norm is 11.

Fact. The equator of a d-dim sphere is a subspace of the d-dim Euclidean space.

Definition. The distance between a point xx and a closed set CiC_i is dist(x,Ci)=infyCiyxdist(x,C_i) = \inf_{y \in C_i} ||y-x||, i.e the distance between xx and the closest point of CiC_i.

Fact. If point pp is in closed set CiC_i, then dist(p,Ci)=0dist(p, C_i) = 0, and if not then dist(p,Ci)>0dist(p, C_i) > 0.

Definition. Two points of a sphere are antipodal if they are diametrically opposite, i.e expressed as pp and p-p.

Definition. The open hemisphere of pole xx is H(x)={ySdx,y>0}H(x) = \{ y \in \mathbb{S}^d \mid \langle x,y \rangle > 0 \}.

Topological Methods

Lemma 1. Given f:S1S1f: S^1 \rightarrow S^1, and f(z)=f(z)  zS1f(-z) = -f(z) \; \forall z \in S^1, then deg(f)deg(f) is odd.

Proof. Recall by definition deg(f)=wind(f(e2πit))deg(f) = wind(f(e^{2 \pi it})). Set g:[0,1]S1g:[0,1] \rightarrow S^1 by g(t)=f(e2πit)g(t) = f(e^{2 \pi it}).

If z=e2πitz = e^{2\pi it} then z=eπi=eπiz=eπie2πit=eπi+2πit=e2πi(t+1/2)-z = e^{\pi i} = e^{\pi i}z = e^{\pi i} e^{2 \pi it} = e^{\pi i + 2 \pi it} = e^{2 \pi i (t + 1/2)}.

If 0t120 \leq t \leq \frac{1}{2} then 12t+121\frac{1}{2} \leq t+\frac{1}{2} \leq 1. We have g(t+12)=f(e2πi(t+1/2))=f(z)=f(z)=f(e2πit)=g(t)g(t+\frac{1}{2}) = f(e^{2 \pi i (t + 1/2)}) = f(-z) = -f(z) = -f(e^{2\pi it}) = -g(t).

For a partition of [0,1][0,1] into [0,12][12,1][0,\frac{1}{2}] \cup [\frac{1}{2}, 1], partition [0,12][0, \frac{1}{2}] into k=1n[tk1,tk]\bigcup_{k=1}^n [t_{k-1}, t_k], where θk<π2|\theta_k| < \frac{\pi}{2} for g(tk)g(tk1)=eiθk\frac{g(t_k)}{g(t_{k-1})} = e^{i \theta_k}. Partition [12,1]=k=1n[12+tk1,12+tk][\frac{1}{2}, 1] = \bigcup_{k=1}^n [\frac{1}{2} + t_{k-1}, \frac{1}{2} + t_k].

It follows g(12+tk)g(12+tk1)=g(tk)g(tk1)=eiθk\frac{g(\frac{1}{2} + t_k)}{g(\frac{1}{2} + t_{k-1})} = \frac{-g(t_k)}{-g(t_{k-1})} = e^{i \theta_k}.

Observe an approximation of the integral of the winding number would be

12π(i=1nf(zi)Δi)=12π(θ1++θn+θ1++θn)\frac{1}{2\pi} \left ( \sum_{i=1}^n f(z_i) \cdot \Delta_i \right ) = \frac{1}{2\pi} (\theta_1 + \dots + \theta_n + \theta_1 + \dots + \theta_n)

Observe g(12)=g(0)g(\frac{1}{2}) = -g(0), and

g(tn)g(tn1)g(tn1)g(tn2)g(t2)g(t1)g(t1)g(t0)=tnt0=1/20=1eiθneiθn1eiθ2eiθ1=ei(θ1+θ2++θn)=\begin{aligned} \frac{g(t_n)}{g(t_{n-1})} \cdot \frac{g(t_{n-1})}{g(t_{n-2})} \cdot \dots \cdot \frac{g(t_2)}{g(t_1)} \cdot \frac{g(t_1)}{g(t_0)} &= \frac{t_n}{t_0} = \frac{1/2}{0} = -1 \\ e^{i \theta_n} \cdot e^{i \theta_{n-1}} \cdot \dots \cdot e^{i \theta_2} \cdot e^{i \theta_1} &= \\ e^{i(\theta_1 + \theta_2 + \dots + \theta_n)} &= \end{aligned}

But we know eiπ=1e^{i \pi} = -1. Hence θ1+θ2++θn=π+2πN\theta_1 + \theta_2 + \dots + \theta_n = \pi + 2 \pi N for some integer NN.

It follows the wind approximation is

12π((π+2πN)+(π+2πN))=12π(2π+4πN)=1+2N\frac{1}{2 \pi}((\pi + 2 \pi N) + (\pi + 2 \pi N)) = \frac{1}{2 \pi}(2 \pi + 4 \pi N) = 1 + 2N

which is an odd number.

Indeed, a sequence of odd numbers converges to an odd number. Therefore, the winding number is odd.

Lemma 2. No map f:S2S1f:S^2 \rightarrow S^1 such that f(p)=f(p)  pS2f(-p) = -f(p) \; \forall p \in S^2.

Theorem. 2-dim Borsuk-Ulam. If f:S2R2f: S^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 is continuous, then pS2\exists p \in S^2 such that f(p)=f(p)f(-p) = f(p).

Proof. Suppose towards contradiction f(x)f(x)  xS2f(x) \neq f(-x) \; \forall x \in S^2. Construct map g:S2S1g: S^2 \rightarrow S^1 by

g(x)=f(x)f(x)f(x)f(x)2S1g(x) = \frac{f(x) - f(-x)}{|| f(x) - f(-x) ||_2} \in S^1 \\

Observe

xS2g(x)=f(x)f((x))f(x)f((x))2=f(x)f(x)f(x)f(x)2=g(x)\forall x \in S^2 \quad g(-x) = \frac{f(-x) - f(-(-x))}{|| f(-x) - f(-(-x)) ||_2} = \frac{f(-x) - f(x)}{|| f(-x) - f(x) ||_2} = -g(x)

Contradicting lemma 2.

Theorem. Borsuk-Ulam. If f:SnRnf: S^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n is continuous, then pSn\exists p \in S^n such that f(p)=f(p)f(-p) = f(p).

The proof is a natural generalization but requires concepts beyond a first course in topology.

Theorem. Lyusternik & Shnirel’man. If SnS^n is covered by closed sets C1,C2,,Cn,Cn+1C_1, C_2, \dots, C_n, C_{n+1}, then there pSnp \in S^n and CiC_i such that p,pCip,-p \in C_i.

Proof. Assume towards contradiction that if pCip \in C_i then p∉Ci-p \not\in C_i for all pSnp \in S^n. Define functions f1,f2,,fn+1:SnRf_1, f_2, \dots, f_{n+1}: S^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R} by fi(x)=dist(x,Ci)f_i(x) = dist(x, C_i). Construct f:SnRnf: S^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n by f(x)=(f1(x)fn+1(x),f2(x)fn+1(x),,fn(x)fn+1)f(x) = (f_1(x) - f_{n+1}(x), f_2(x) - f_{n+1}(x), \dots, f_n(x) - f_{n+1}).

By Borsuk-Ulam there are p,pSnp, -p \in S^n such that f(p)=f(p)f(p) = f(-p). It follows for all 1i,jn+11 \leq i,j \leq n+1

fi(p)fn+1(p)=fi(p)fn+1(p)fj(p)fn+1(p)=fj(p)fn+1(p)\begin{aligned} f_i(p) - f_{n+1}(p) &= f_i(-p) - f_{n+1}(-p)\\ f_j(p) - f_{n+1}(p) &= f_j(-p) - f_{n+1}(-p) \end{aligned}

So fi(p)fj(p)=fi(p)fj(p)f_i(p) - f_j(p) = f_i(-p) - f_j(-p).

Since pSn=C1Cn+1p \in S^n = C_1 \cup \dots \cup C_{n+1}, we get pCip \in C_i for some ii. Similarly pSn-p \in S^n so pCj-p \in C_j for some jj. By hypothesis iji \neq j. Clearly fi(p)=fj(p)=0f_i(p) = f_j(-p) = 0. Then

fi(p)fj(p)=fi(p)fj(p)fj(p)=fi(p)\begin{aligned} f_i(p) - f_j(p) &= f_i(-p) - f_j(-p) \\ -f_j(p) &= f_i(-p) \end{aligned}

But fj(p)>0f_j(p) > 0 since p∉Cjp \not\in C_j, and similarly fi(p)>0f_i(p) > 0. So we have an equality between a negative and a positive number. Contradiction.

Theorems

Definition. The Kneser graph KGn,kKG_{n,k} for n2n \geq 2, k1k \geq 1, has vertex set C([n],k)C([n], k), and any two vertices u,vC([n],k)u,v \in C([n], k) are adjacent if and only if they are disjoint, i.e. uv=ϕu \cap v = \phi.

Theorem. The chromatic number of the Kneser graph KGn,kKG_{n,k} is n2k+2n-2k+2.

Fix nn and kk. Assume for the sake of contradiction, the chromatic number of Kneser graph KGn,kKG_{n,k} is less than n2k+2n-2k+2. Then we have a proper coloring c:C([n],k){1,,n2k+1}c: C([n], k) \rightarrow \{ 1, \dots, n-2k+1 \} using at most n2k+1n-2k+1 colors. Set d=n2k+1d = n-2k+1 and take a set XX of nn vectors on the d-dim sphere Sd\mathbb{S}^d where any d+1d+1 vectors are linearly independent.

Let Ui={xSdk-set  SX,c(S)=i,SH(x)}U_i = \{ x \in \mathbb{S}^d \mid \exists k\text{-set} \; S \subset X, c(S) = i, S \subset H(x) \} for i=1,,di=1,\dots,d, and take complement A=Sd(U1Ud)A = \mathbb{S}^d \setminus (U_1 \cup \dots \cup U_d). We claim each UiU_i is open.

To see why, fix a point ySdy \in S^{d}, and observe Uy={xSn1:x,y>0}U_{y} = \{ x \in S^{n-1} : \langle x, y \rangle > 0 \} is open as it is the preimage of the open set (0,)(0, \infty) under the continuous map fy(x)=x,yf_y(x) = \langle x, y \rangle.\ For finite k-subset B={y1,,yk}B = \{ y_1, \dots, y_k \}, Observe

UB=j=1kUyj={xSn1:x,yj>0 j}U_B = \bigcap_{j=1}^k U_{y_j} = \left\{ x \in S^{n-1} : \langle x, y_j \rangle > 0 \ \forall j \right\}

is an intersection of finitely many open sets, hence open.

Therefore Ui=B([n]k)c(B)=iUBU_i = \bigcup_{\substack{B \in \binom{[n]}{k} \\ c(B)=i}} U_B is a union of open sets, hence open. Moreover complement AA is closed.

Clearly AA alongside UiU_i do cover Sd\mathbb{S}^d. So if none of them contains a pair of antipodal points, then neither does Sd\mathbb{S}^d, hence contradicting the Lyusternik & Shnirel’man theorem. We aim to reach that contradiction. Consider xSdx \in \mathbb{S}^d.

Case 1. xUix \in U_i, i.e H(x)H(x) contains a k-subset colored with color ii, corresponding to a vertex colored ii. Since H(x)H(x) and H(x)H(-x) are disjoint, any k-subset in H(x)H(-x), is disjoint from any k-subset in H(x)H(x). Thereby, corresponding vertices are adjacent. Since the coloring is proper by hypothesis, H(x)H(-x) does not contain a k-subset colored with ii, hence x∉Ui-x \not\in U_i.

Case 2. ±xA\pm x \in A. By definition of AA, neither H(x)H(x) nor H(x)H(-x) contains a k-subset of XX. Hence each of H(x)H(x) and H(x)H(-x) contains at most k1k-1 vectors. It follows there is at least n2(k1)=n2k+2=d+1n-2(k-1) = n-2k+2 = d+1 points in the equator {ySdx,y=0}\{ y \in \mathbb{S}^d \mid \langle x,y \rangle = 0 \}, contained in a subspace of dim d, concluding they are linearly dependent. Contradiction.

Finally we show a valid constructive coloring of KGn,kKG_{n,k} using n2k+2n-2k + 2 colors. Color each k-set with all elements in [2k1][2k - 1] with one color, and every other k-set by their largest element. Thereby we use at most n(2k1)+1=n2k+2n - (2k-1) + 1 = n - 2k + 2 colors, where all k-sets of a given color intersect.

Resources