Preliminaries#
Graph Theory#
Definition. A coloring is proper if no adjacent vertices are assigned the same color.
Definition. The chromatic number χ(G) is the smallest number of colours to colour a graph.
Complex Analysis#
Definition. A curve γ in open U⊆C is
γ:[a,b]→UNotation. The curve γ could be expressed as a parameteric function f(e2πit) for 0≤t≤1.
Definition. The continuity of a complex-valued function is defined in an analogous manner to real-valued functions.
Definition. For continuous F:[a,b]→C, the integral of [a,b] is
∫abF(t)dt=∫abu(t)dt+i∫abv(t)dtDefinition. The winding number with respect to point α over closed path γ is
W(γ,α)=2πi1∫γz−α1dzDefinition. The degree of a function deg(f) is the wind number W(f(e2πit)).
Other#
Fact. Vectors of d-dim sphere are exactly the vectors of the (d+1)-dim Euclidean space whose norm is 1.
Fact. The equator of a d-dim sphere is a subspace of the d-dim Euclidean space.
Definition. The distance between a point x and a closed set Ci is dist(x,Ci)=infy∈Ci∣∣y−x∣∣, i.e the distance between x and the closest point of Ci.
Fact. If point p is in closed set Ci, then dist(p,Ci)=0, and if not then dist(p,Ci)>0.
Definition. Two points of a sphere are antipodal if they are diametrically opposite, i.e expressed as p and −p.
Definition. The open hemisphere of pole x is H(x)={y∈Sd∣⟨x,y⟩>0}.
Topological Methods#
Lemma 1. Given f:S1→S1, and f(−z)=−f(z)∀z∈S1, then deg(f) is odd.
Proof. Recall by definition deg(f)=wind(f(e2πit)). Set g:[0,1]→S1 by g(t)=f(e2πit).
If z=e2πit then −z=eπi=eπiz=eπie2πit=eπi+2πit=e2πi(t+1/2).
If 0≤t≤21 then 21≤t+21≤1. We have g(t+21)=f(e2πi(t+1/2))=f(−z)=−f(z)=−f(e2πit)=−g(t).
For a partition of [0,1] into [0,21]∪[21,1], partition [0,21] into ⋃k=1n[tk−1,tk], where ∣θk∣<2π for g(tk−1)g(tk)=eiθk. Partition [21,1]=⋃k=1n[21+tk−1,21+tk].
It follows g(21+tk−1)g(21+tk)=−g(tk−1)−g(tk)=eiθk.
Observe an approximation of the integral of the winding number would be
2π1(i=1∑nf(zi)⋅Δi)=2π1(θ1+⋯+θn+θ1+⋯+θn)Observe g(21)=−g(0), and
g(tn−1)g(tn)⋅g(tn−2)g(tn−1)⋅⋯⋅g(t1)g(t2)⋅g(t0)g(t1)eiθn⋅eiθn−1⋅⋯⋅eiθ2⋅eiθ1ei(θ1+θ2+⋯+θn)=t0tn=01/2=−1==But we know eiπ=−1. Hence θ1+θ2+⋯+θn=π+2πN for some integer N.
It follows the wind approximation is
2π1((π+2πN)+(π+2πN))=2π1(2π+4πN)=1+2Nwhich is an odd number.
Indeed, a sequence of odd numbers converges to an odd number. Therefore, the winding number is odd.
Lemma 2. No map f:S2→S1 such that f(−p)=−f(p)∀p∈S2.
Theorem. 2-dim Borsuk-Ulam. If f:S2→R2 is continuous, then ∃p∈S2 such that f(−p)=f(p).
Proof. Suppose towards contradiction f(x)=f(−x)∀x∈S2. Construct map g:S2→S1 by
g(x)=∣∣f(x)−f(−x)∣∣2f(x)−f(−x)∈S1Observe
∀x∈S2g(−x)=∣∣f(−x)−f(−(−x))∣∣2f(−x)−f(−(−x))=∣∣f(−x)−f(x)∣∣2f(−x)−f(x)=−g(x)Contradicting lemma 2.
Theorem. Borsuk-Ulam. If f:Sn→Rn is continuous, then ∃p∈Sn such that f(−p)=f(p).
The proof is a natural generalization but requires concepts beyond a first course in topology.
Theorem. Lyusternik & Shnirel’man. If Sn is covered by closed sets C1,C2,…,Cn,Cn+1, then there p∈Sn and Ci such that p,−p∈Ci.
Proof. Assume towards contradiction that if p∈Ci then −p∈Ci for all p∈Sn. Define functions f1,f2,…,fn+1:Sn→R by fi(x)=dist(x,Ci). Construct f:Sn→Rn by f(x)=(f1(x)−fn+1(x),f2(x)−fn+1(x),…,fn(x)−fn+1).
By Borsuk-Ulam there are p,−p∈Sn such that f(p)=f(−p). It follows for all 1≤i,j≤n+1
fi(p)−fn+1(p)fj(p)−fn+1(p)=fi(−p)−fn+1(−p)=fj(−p)−fn+1(−p)So fi(p)−fj(p)=fi(−p)−fj(−p).
Since p∈Sn=C1∪⋯∪Cn+1, we get p∈Ci for some i. Similarly −p∈Sn so −p∈Cj for some j. By hypothesis i=j. Clearly fi(p)=fj(−p)=0. Then
fi(p)−fj(p)−fj(p)=fi(−p)−fj(−p)=fi(−p)But fj(p)>0 since p∈Cj, and similarly fi(p)>0. So we have an equality between a negative and a positive number. Contradiction.
Theorems#
Definition. The Kneser graph KGn,k for n≥2, k≥1, has vertex set C([n],k), and any two vertices u,v∈C([n],k) are adjacent if and only if they are disjoint, i.e. u∩v=ϕ.
Theorem. The chromatic number of the Kneser graph KGn,k is n−2k+2.
Fix n and k. Assume for the sake of contradiction, the chromatic number of Kneser graph KGn,k is less than n−2k+2. Then we have a proper coloring c:C([n],k)→{1,…,n−2k+1} using at most n−2k+1 colors. Set d=n−2k+1 and take a set X of n vectors on the d-dim sphere Sd where any d+1 vectors are linearly independent.
Let Ui={x∈Sd∣∃k-setS⊂X,c(S)=i,S⊂H(x)} for i=1,…,d, and take complement A=Sd∖(U1∪⋯∪Ud). We claim each Ui is open.
To see why, fix a point y∈Sd, and observe Uy={x∈Sn−1:⟨x,y⟩>0} is open as it is the preimage of the open set (0,∞) under the continuous map fy(x)=⟨x,y⟩.\ For finite k-subset B={y1,…,yk}, Observe
UB=j=1⋂kUyj={x∈Sn−1:⟨x,yj⟩>0 ∀j}is an intersection of finitely many open sets, hence open.
Therefore Ui=⋃B∈(k[n])c(B)=iUB is a union of open sets, hence open. Moreover complement A is closed.
Clearly A alongside Ui do cover Sd. So if none of them contains a pair of antipodal points, then neither does Sd, hence contradicting the Lyusternik & Shnirel’man theorem. We aim to reach that contradiction. Consider x∈Sd.
Case 1. x∈Ui, i.e H(x) contains a k-subset colored with color i, corresponding to a vertex colored i. Since H(x) and H(−x) are disjoint, any k-subset in H(−x), is disjoint from any k-subset in H(x). Thereby, corresponding vertices are adjacent. Since the coloring is proper by hypothesis, H(−x) does not contain a k-subset colored with i, hence −x∈Ui.
Case 2. ±x∈A. By definition of A, neither H(x) nor H(−x) contains a k-subset of X. Hence each of H(x) and H(−x) contains at most k−1 vectors. It follows there is at least n−2(k−1)=n−2k+2=d+1 points in the equator {y∈Sd∣⟨x,y⟩=0}, contained in a subspace of dim d, concluding they are linearly dependent. Contradiction.
Finally we show a valid constructive coloring of KGn,k using n−2k+2 colors. Color each k-set with all elements in [2k−1] with one color, and every other k-set by their largest element. Thereby we use at most n−(2k−1)+1=n−2k+2 colors, where all k-sets of a given color intersect.
Resources#